It looks like everything has worked for the move over to “Disruptive Conversations”. The one thing that appears NOT to have worked in the conversion is the FeedFlare. Since I changed the feed name, the FeedFlare script changed… and now it does look like I have to edit the advanced templates to fix it. So, I return to the coding…
Odds are, if you are looking at this page today in Firefox, you’re seeing a nice little horizontal navigation bar at the top of the page underneath the banner. If you are looking at this page today in IE7… well… you are probably wondering what navigation bar I am talking about!
You see… I’m experimenting with a navigation bar at the top of the page just underneath the banner so that as I move from a single blog into a network of topic-specific blogs, I’d like readers (and myself) to be able to easily move between them. Armed with the excellent tutorial over on Typepadhacks.org, I’ve been experimenting with TypePad’s advanced templates. If you look over at the top of Disruptive Telephony, you’ll see that I’m using the “Overlapping horizontal tabs” style found at the excellent DynamicDrive CSS Library. It’s all done with Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) and a few little images. Pretty fun stuff.
However, I thought that I’d try another style as well to see how it works. So I tried the “Shade Image” style for comparison. The result, in Firefox, is quite nice (click for a larger image):
However, if you take a look at it in Internet Explorer (I’ve now tried either IE6 or IE7), you get this:
Not exactly what we’re looking for! Now, the “overlapping horizontal tabs” menu looks okay in IE, although the horizontal line annoyingly doesn’t line up with the bottom of the tabs, so that may be the one I use for the other blogs – or I may try some of the other styles.
I do like the “Slanted Divider” menu and the “Chrome” menu bar isn’t bad either, but neither of those shows you visibly which blog you are on. That’s what I liked about these other two – it was very easy to see which menu choice you are on.
Just too bad that the CSS for that menu bar works so nicely in Firefox looks so poor in MSIE!
Given everything else that is so automated in typepad, it’s a bit of an annoyance that when you switch from "Basic" to "Advanced" templates, as I have done here, you wind up without any RSS feeds that you have added to the sidebar. To restore those RSS feeds, you have to follow this procedure, which essentially amounts to "View the source of the old page and copy/paste into the new templates." Obviously, it works… but given how everything else gets carried across in the conversion, it’s puzzling that this one does not. Perhaps some day the Six Apart folks will make that work for TypePad. In the meantime, we’ll just "use the source, Luke".
Just testing to see why the FeedFlare is not appearing yet on posts. FeedFlare seems to be working even the Advanced Templates, so it looks like I do NOT need to edit the individual template files, which is good to know.
(Originally posted to http://dyork.livejournal.com/264769.html )
Linden Labs officially announced that the source code for the Second
Life client has now been made open source! More than just "open
source", the source code has actually been licensed under the GPL,
which is by far one of the most stringent of the various open source licenses.
What this primarily means is that any modifications made by other
developers – and subsequently distributed to others – must be made
available under the GPL back to the rest of the community. The end
result should ideally be greater innovation in general. (I’ll also note
that Linden Labs will offer commercial licensing of their software to those interested.)[1]
So what does this mean for regular Second Life users? Today? Probably not much initially. But longer term it has a huge
potential impact. One of the barriers, in my opinion, to SecondLife or
any of the other existing virtual worlds becoming the primary virtual
world in use has been the fact that all of the client interfaces have
been proprietary clients using proprietary protocols. No real way for
people to understand what is going on or to build their own specialized
clients.
In contrast, think of the World Wide Web. It’s wide
open using open protocols like HTTP and HTML that are easy for anyone
to use. Anyone can write a web browser using whatever language they
want. Anyone can create a web server… again in any language. (I’ve
written one in the past.) And if you don’t like one of the existing web
browsers whose code is open source, you can take that source code and
modify it. How many derivatives of Netscape’s original code have been
created? How many Firefox derivates are out there? Think of the rich
number of browser clients that are out there. IE, Firefox, Mozilla,
Opera, Flock… and seven zillion other ones. All competing in various
ways with new features and capabilities. The 2-D web interface allows full innovation… and look what has happened!
In contrast, for Second Life there is currently exactly one client. The one from Linden Labs.
If Second Life is indeed to become the primary 3-D collaborative interface (and that is right now to be a big "if"),
one of the basic requirements is to allow this type of openness and
integration for interaction. People need to be able to develop other
clients… perhaps specialized… perhaps competing with the LindenLabs
client. Many people will hopefully take a look through the LL client
code and send potential fixes back to LL for inclusion in the client.
In the end, that means we’ll have a stronger and more robust client.
Others may take a look at the code, decide that they can write a much
better client and do so! (With the guidance from the LL code on how to
interact with the SL server environment.)
Other developers may
use this as an opportunity to "scratch an itch" and fix something that
has always bothered them or add something that they always wanted to
add. Those itch-scratches will make their way back to Linden Labs who
may (or may not) choose to incorporate them into the main SL client.
The end result could be a much more stable SL client with more
features. Or not… it largely depends on if developers are able to figure out what LL does in the code and decide to make changes.
Now
the client is only half the issue. For SL to truly grow into the
overall 3-D interface, you’d need the server as well. From what I could
see that is not – yet – open source, but this statement certainly could
give one hope (emphasis added):
A lot of the Second Life
development work currently in progress is focused on building the
Second Life Grid — a vision of a globally interconnected grid with
clients and servers published and managed by different groups.
Think
again of the Web. It’s an amalgam of servers run by a zillion different
people (using a wide range of clients. That’s where the 3-D Internet
needs to get to… whether that is SL or not that brings it to that
point is a different question. This statement, though, does show that
Linden Labs certainly understands that it needs to get there. They end
with a nice quote:
Releasing the source now is our next
invitation to the world to help build this global space for
communication, business, and entertainment. We are eager to work with
the community and businesses to further our vision of our space.
Kudos
to Linden Labs for taking this step… in the short term there may be
some hiccups (as attackers look through the code to see if there are
any holes to exploit immediately), but in the long term I think it
bodes well for the future of Second Life as that collaborative
interface. It will be fascinating to see what happens next…
[1] I’ll park my GPL pedant hat for a moment, because the statement at the bottom of their licensing page does make we wonder a bit. Specifically, "Note that some components necessary for use with the Second Life viewerare licensed from third parties under different licenses."
Are those "components" included as part of the actual distribution? Do
they fit into the "mere aggregation" clause of the GPLv2? Or are they
libraries linked in? And how are they linked? I don’t understand
exactly how the SL code is put together, but statements like that just
do raise a red flag to me… hopefully Linden Labs did go over all of
this with GPL-literate attorneys.
(Originally posted to http://dyork.livejournal.com/263277.html )
Robert Scoble spent the week between Christmas and New Years touring around with presidential candidate John Edwards and it has made for interesting reading. His “Things I learned” post and his response to criticism about his questioning both made for interesting reads. All quite fascinating as we continue to see the evolution of the role of social media.
Thanks for taking us along on the trip, Robert.
UPDATE: I recently came across this post that I wrote on this topic back in August 2005 that also provided a couple of examples (one of which I note is no longer available, but hey, 1.5 years is ages in terms of the web).
(Originally posted to http://dyork.livejournal.com/261661.html )
Continuing a theme I’ve harped on numerous times over the past year or two in FIR reports and posts here, I sent a message to the New England Podcasting mailing list today talking again about the incredible importance of making it easy for other people to promote your brand in social media in a graphical form. You can read the message but the point can be summarized in this:
If you want people in the social media world to help promote your brand, make it easy for them to get a logo or other image associated with your brand.
Ideally make it a nice little graphic people can right-click and grab (either as an image or link) directly from your home page, as both Mitel (my employer) and also Skype have done. Or make a seperate page as Shel and Neville did over at FIR with a link to that page from the sidebar of the home page. Whatever you do, just make it easy and people will help you promote your brand.
Now, of course, total control freaks will argue – correctly – that people can also abuse your brand if you make the logo available. Definitely! For instance, I’ve seen the Skype logo morphed into so many different forms… behind jail bars… with a big red circle/bar (to indicate "No Skype here")… Jan over in Malaysia is always inserting into various images, not always of the charitable type. But there’s two arguments there: 1) in the end, the abusers are using your brand image (and they probably would anyway) and inadvertantly helping promote your brand logo; and 2) unless you are doing really hideous things as a company, there are probably far more who will use your image positively.
I’d also add that if you are such a control freak, you certainly aren’t going to do well in "social media" and you may as well just prepare right now to be outdone by more social-media-savvy competitors. Run away now while you still can (and perhaps consider a different career move… any illusions of control in PR/marketing are swiftly being destroyed in the world of user-generated content… at best you can hope to control some aspects like the images used (maybe) and some of the message – but that involves engaging in the conversation).
Anyway, have you looked at your company/entity/podcast website lately? Is there a graphic readily available that people can use?
(Originally posted to http://dyork.livejournal.com/262570.html)
Tis the season to launch new shows… C.C. just passed word that he’s launched a new video podcast at http://www.oneguysthoughts.com/, primarily as a way to beta-test CastBlaster Video… interesting to see…