Category Archives: Social Media

Almost to Ontario for the Podcast Expo…

200709280016Almost to Ontario… California, that is. It’s been an absolutely exhausting three days here in Phoenix at AstriCon (coverage on my Disruptive Telephony blog), but now it’s time to get onboard yet another plane and head over to Ontario, California. As you can see in the picture, I’m now at the Phoenix airport at gate A10 waiting to get on a US Air flight out of here at 9:41pm. We have a plane and a crew, so that’s all good. We should start boarding in a few minutes. While it made sense to do these conferences back-to-back, it’s definitely a bit on the exhausting side. I am, though, very much looking forward to meeting many friends in the podcasting community. Just one more flight….

Technorati Tags: , ,

Facebook brings the twin taboos of politics and religion into the workplace

200709240904Some time back I became a Facebook “friend” with someone I had known professionally for several years. I did not work with the person all that much, but had great respect for the person based on the several dealings I had had with them. However, now that we were “friends” I was almost immediately exposed to two pieces of information that they had included in their Facebook profile: political affiliation and religion. As it happened, this particular person’s views were pretty much completely opposite to my own and before I could really think about it I experienced a deep knee-jerk reaction of “Oh, you’re kidding, he/she is not really one of them?” For a brief moment, until my brain could re-engage, my respect for that person plummeted through the floor. A moment or two later, the rational side of my brain kicked in and reminded me that I had had a great amount of professional respect for the person 10 seconds before and nothing had changed that should have altered that. Still, there was that deep emotional response.

Politics? Religion? In the workplace? With professional colleagues? Huh?

At least here in North America, those are two topics that are generally taboo in the work environment. Verboten. In fact, in most areas you are not legally allowed to ask employees or potential employees about those topics. Within a work place there of course may be lunchroom discussions about recent politics and so you may learn of others viewpoints. Religion might come up, but again probably with people with whom you work closely.

But with customers? Or partners?

Never. At least in my experience.

And why should it come up, really? When you are buying a product/service from someone, or selling it to someone, what do politics or religion matter? (or gender or race?) If you are partnering with someone to deliver a service/product, again, why does it matter? What matters is whether both of you can work together and deliver the product/service – and presumably make some money through the deal.

Religion and politics should not matter in business dealings.

Now, of course, there are “business directories” that many churches offer trying to connect people within the church community, but that’s a different matter as it is within that community and trying to help each out. There are also websites out there that can help you steer your business toward companies with similar views as yours. But in general, the political leanings and religious preference of a supplier or customer do not factor into the normal course of business.

Yet here we are in Facebook choosing (or not) to provide all that information to (potential) customers.

I recognize that there are a good number of folks out there who are apathetic about all things related to politics and/or religion. They don’t care at all about what someone’s religion is or what their politics are. I’ve met many. Often they say they don’t care about religious/spiritual issues, haven’t attended a church (or spiritual service) in years (or ever) and haven’t voted in any elections. Religion and/or politics mean nothing to them and so they take no offense or don’t even notice when someone states their political or religious preference.

Leaving the completely apathetic aside, though, most people have some opinion about politics and some view about religion/spirituality. The stronger those views, of course, the more deep the emotional reactions. A hard-core liberal in the US may have (or at least appreciate) a bumper sticker “Friends don’t let friends vote Republican”. A hard-core conservative may view all liberals as traitors and the source of all the country’s problems. A strong “born again” Christian may see that the problems of the world are because people have not accepted Jesus Christ as their lord and savior and need to do so. A strong atheist may see that the problems of the world are because of the very existence of religion and that it is the root of all evil. These are deeply-ingrained views:

Politics and religion are part of our core identity that helps form who we define ourselves to be.



When that part of our identity is confronted by a polar opposite, we naturally react. Conservative Christians will have second thoughts about atheists, and atheists will have second thoughts about conservative Christians. Ultra-liberal Democrats will instinctively distrust ultra-conservative Republicans – and vice-versa. It’s just part and parcel of being human and building these beliefs into your identity.

Within the work environment, though, these twin areas of politics and religion have not been part of normal discourse… but yet, if you choose to fill out those fields in Facebook, they are suddenly exposed to all your “friends”.

It works the other way, of course. Some time back I added another “friend” whose politics and religion closely aligned with me. Again, without any rational thinking, the thought popped into my brain “Oh, he/she’s that. No wonder why we got along so well.” In the mass of people out there, we seek out those communities of like-minded people… those affinities that we can use to build stronger connections.

Which is why having fields for politics and religion make so much sense for Facebook’s original audience of college students. You are about to land in a campus of 10,000 people, of whom you know basically no one. How do you find new people? How do you find potential friends? Searching on “interests” is one way… but searching on political views or religion is another great way. Odds are that if they claim a similar religious view (or upbringing), they probably have a similar world view to yours. Likewise if they have similar political leanings, you probably have more in common upon which to potentially build a friendship. It makes total sense in that environment. Likewise, if Facebook is just used among your “friends”, odds are that they probably already know these views about you. But today we are overloading the term “friend” and so now it encompasses true “friends”, family… and business contacts.

So it’s one thing to share political/religious info with friends, family and classmates, but in business? I don’t know… on the one hand there is the greater “transparency” and the chance to make connections with other people. On the other hand, there is the strong chance of potentially alienating others.

200709240851In any event, the fields are there in your Facebook profile if you choose to fill them out (and many people seem to during the process of signing up). Of course, you are limited to the choices that Facebook provides for politics. They don’t offer the “It’s Complicated” choice that they have for relationships, which would be quite useful. The “Religious Views” field is free text entry, so you can really write whatever you want there. It seems to me that you really have four choices:

  1. Leave them blank – probably the safest choice, but potentially then losing out on some networking possibilities.
  2. Enter generic choices – you could be safe and choose “Moderate” and write in something vague for a religion.
  3. Fill out only one – you’ll see I have a political entry but not a religious entry.
  4. Fill them both out – embrace full transparency and let the world know (or at least your “friends”) your affiliations and beliefs.

To me this is just yet another one of those areas where we don’t fully understand the full impact of the profiles of Facebook and, in fairness, all the other social networking services. In the rush to join these services, we just fill out all sorts of information, not necessarily taking the time to think about the potential impact exposing that information may have.

What do you think? If you are a Facebook user, have you filled out those two fields? Do you think people should in an effort to be more transparent? Do you think we understand the full ramifications of exposing information like this? (Or do you think the issue I raise here is really not an issue?)

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Facebook brings the twin taboos of politics and religion into the workplace

200709240904Some time back I became a Facebook “friend” with someone I had known professionally for several years. I did not work with the person all that much, but had great respect for the person based on the several dealings I had had with them. However, now that we were “friends” I was almost immediately exposed to two pieces of information that they had included in their Facebook profile: political affiliation and religion. As it happened, this particular person’s views were pretty much completely opposite to my own and before I could really think about it I experienced a deep knee-jerk reaction of “Oh, you’re kidding, he/she is not really one of them?” For a brief moment, until my brain could re-engage, my respect for that person plummeted through the floor. A moment or two later, the rational side of my brain kicked in and reminded me that I had had a great amount of professional respect for the person 10 seconds before and nothing had changed that should have altered that. Still, there was that deep emotional response.

Politics? Religion? In the workplace? With professional colleagues? Huh?

At least here in North America, those are two topics that are generally taboo in the work environment. Verboten. In fact, in most areas you are not legally allowed to ask employees or potential employees about those topics. Within a work place there of course may be lunchroom discussions about recent politics and so you may learn of others viewpoints. Religion might come up, but again probably with people with whom you work closely.

But with customers? Or partners?

Never. At least in my experience.

And why should it come up, really? When you are buying a product/service from someone, or selling it to someone, what do politics or religion matter? (or gender or race?) If you are partnering with someone to deliver a service/product, again, why does it matter? What matters is whether both of you can work together and deliver the product/service – and presumably make some money through the deal.

Religion and politics should not matter in business dealings.

Now, of course, there are “business directories” that many churches offer trying to connect people within the church community, but that’s a different matter as it is within that community and trying to help each out. There are also websites out there that can help you steer your business toward companies with similar views as yours. But in general, the political leanings and religious preference of a supplier or customer do not factor into the normal course of business.

Yet here we are in Facebook choosing (or not) to provide all that information to (potential) customers.

I recognize that there are a good number of folks out there who are apathetic about all things related to politics and/or religion. They don’t care at all about what someone’s religion is or what their politics are. I’ve met many. Often they say they don’t care about religious/spiritual issues, haven’t attended a church (or spiritual service) in years (or ever) and haven’t voted in any elections. Religion and/or politics mean nothing to them and so they take no offense or don’t even notice when someone states their political or religious preference.

Leaving the completely apathetic aside, though, most people have some opinion about politics and some view about religion/spirituality. The stronger those views, of course, the more deep the emotional reactions. A hard-core liberal in the US may have (or at least appreciate) a bumper sticker “Friends don’t let friends vote Republican”. A hard-core conservative may view all liberals as traitors and the source of all the country’s problems. A strong “born again” Christian may see that the problems of the world are because people have not accepted Jesus Christ as their lord and savior and need to do so. A strong atheist may see that the problems of the world are because of the very existence of religion and that it is the root of all evil. These are deeply-ingrained views:

Politics and religion are part of our core identity that helps form who we define ourselves to be.

When that part of our identity is confronted by a polar opposite, we naturally react. Conservative Christians will have second thoughts about atheists, and atheists will have second thoughts about conservative Christians. Ultra-liberal Democrats will instinctively distrust ultra-conservative Republicans – and vice-versa. It’s just part and parcel of being human and building these beliefs into your identity.

Within the work environment, though, these twin areas of politics and religion have not been part of normal discourse… but yet, if you choose to fill out those fields in Facebook, they are suddenly exposed to all your “friends”.

It works the other way, of course. Some time back I added another “friend” whose politics and religion closely aligned with me. Again, without any rational thinking, the thought popped into my brain “Oh, he/she’s that. No wonder why we got along so well.” In the mass of people out there, we seek out those communities of like-minded people… those affinities that we can use to build stronger connections.

Which is why having fields for politics and religion make so much sense for Facebook’s original audience of college students. You are about to land in a campus of 10,000 people, of whom you know basically no one. How do you find new people? How do you find potential friends? Searching on “interests” is one way… but searching on political views or religion is another great way. Odds are that if they claim a similar religious view (or upbringing), they probably have a similar world view to yours. Likewise if they have similar political leanings, you probably have more in common upon which to potentially build a friendship. It makes total sense in that environment. Likewise, if Facebook is just used among your “friends”, odds are that they probably already know these views about you. But today we are overloading the term “friend” and so now it encompasses true “friends”, family… and business contacts.

So it’s one thing to share political/religious info with friends, family and classmates, but in business? I don’t know… on the one hand there is the greater “transparency” and the chance to make connections with other people. On the other hand, there is the strong chance of potentially alienating others.

200709240851In any event, the fields are there in your Facebook profile if you choose to fill them out (and many people seem to during the process of signing up). Of course, you are limited to the choices that Facebook provides for politics. They don’t offer the “It’s Complicated” choice that they have for relationships, which would be quite useful. The “Religious Views” field is free text entry, so you can really write whatever you want there. It seems to me that you really have four choices:

  1. Leave them blank – probably the safest choice, but potentially then losing out on some networking possibilities.
  2. Enter generic choices – you could be safe and choose “Moderate” and write in something vague for a religion.
  3. Fill out only one – you’ll see I have a political entry but not a religious entry.
  4. Fill them both out – embrace full transparency and let the world know (or at least your “friends”) your affiliations and beliefs.

To me this is just yet another one of those areas where we don’t fully understand the full impact of the profiles of Facebook and, in fairness, all the other social networking services. In the rush to join these services, we just fill out all sorts of information, not necessarily taking the time to think about the potential impact exposing that information may have.

What do you think? If you are a Facebook user, have you filled out those two fields? Do you think people should in an effort to be more transparent? Do you think we understand the full ramifications of exposing information like this? (Or do you think the issue I raise here is really not an issue?)

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Heading out to Podcast and New Media Expo next week…

200709211012I’m delighted to say that I’ll now definitely be at the Podcast and New Media Expo at the end of next week (and into the weekend) out in Ontario, California. I was debating whether or not to go because I’ll be at AstriCon the previous few days in Phoenix, Arizona. Originally I was intending to just do AstriCon, but I’ve changed my schedule a bit so that I’ll fly from Phoenix to Ontario, CA, on Thursday night so that I can participate in PME events on Friday through Sunday. Taking the good old red-eye home Sunday night.

I went to last year’s PME and very much enjoyed spending time with all the various podcasters and bloggers that I’ve come to know. Should be a good bit of fun this year as well, although my focus will be a wee bit different. One of the various new paths I’m very seriously considering is to head into consulting and may do more with social media work. I’ve already been advising several companies about podcasts, blogs, etc…. I may turn that into something more formal. So my trip to PME will be much more business-focused than last year… and I’ll be looking to talk to a number of folks about potential partnership opportunities. (Are you interested in potentially partnering with me? or engaging my services? Let’s talk. 😉

In any event, most of all it will simply be just plain fun to reconnect face-to-face with so many of the other members of the social media community whom I know now as friends!

If you read this and are going to be out at the PME, please do drop a line as I’m always interested to connect with folks.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

What should I get for my next laptop? What’s the best "social media laptop"? integrated webcam? Apple Macbook with Parallels? or Windows PC?

UPDATE – I gave in and bought a MacBook Pro (with 4 GB of RAM!).  More on that later…


With my impending change in employment, I need to get a new laptop and, given that I’m thinking strongly of going the consulting route, I’m going to pick it up myself right now (versus waiting for an employer).  Obviously I want a laptop that works very well for participating in the world of social media.  An integrated webcam seems to be an absolute must.   People involved with video tell me that Apple Macbooks have the best quality video cameras and, being relatively agnostic toward operating systems, I’m open to Macbooks.  I’d love to get a laptop with a built-in camera that can rotate so that you can face it away from the user and toward the other people in a room, for instance.  But it seems that the current crop of laptops no longer have that – they all seem to have fixed cameras. 

Another "must-have" is the ability to work with a second monitor, but that’s usually simple with a laptop.

So I’ve got a couple of questions for those of you working out there with blogs, podcasts, flickr, etc.:

  • Do you have any specific thoughts on the best laptop for "social media" participation?
  • Any recommendations about specific laptops with integrated cameras?  Know of any that aren’t fixed?  (I’ve looked at the major vendors and they all seem to now be fixed.)
  • Mac versus PC?  Mac users who still have to use Windows apps, have you been happy with Parallels? (Or vmWare Fusion?)

Any suggestions would be appreciated.  Thanks.

Jeremiah Owyang demonstrates why Forrester hired him – "Applying a Social Computing Strategy to the entire Product Lifecycle"

Jeremiah Owyang continues to demonstrate today why Forrester hired him with a great (and lengthy) post called “Web Strategy (Advanced): Applying a Social Computing Strategy to the entire Product Lifecycle“.  Excerpting from the post doesn’t do it justice, so I’ll just point you over to the post.  I will include his warning and his intended audience:

Warning: For Advanced Strategists only
This is for the advanced only, not a company that is still trying to answer “what or why”. To gauge the sophistication of your organization,
see this chart. Deploying this strategy without grasping the foundations of social media, the cultural changes it implies or testing trial programs will likely lead to failure.

You: A Social Media Strategist
You’re responsible for the direction of your online strategies for your company or organization, specifically using social media and computing tools to reach, connect, and build communities around your brand. Most folks at your company know this space is important, but don’t know how to do it, they are relying on your expertise to think holistically, integrated, and strategically.

It’s a great post… thanks to Jeremiah for putting it together – and for sharing it with all of us.

Chris Brogan’s "Social Media Toolkit" – a great list to get started.

If you are looking to get started in “social media” – or are interested in how others survive and thrive in the world of social media – Chris Brogan’s post today, “My Social Media Toolkit“, may be of great help to you.  I use most all of the tools Chris lists myself, although being on Windows versus a Mac, I use Windows Movie Maker versus iMovie.  I also don’t really using Upcoming.org although I’ve been considering using it more as a way to somewhat automate the list of events that I am attending.  In the comments to Chris’ entry, I also added the following sites/services/tools that I use as well:

  • del.icio.us – I use http://del.icio.us/ to bookmark and tag all the various sites I find in the course of daily work.  My del.icio.us feed is then a sidebar on a blog, posted to a link blog, etc.
  • Feedburner – I use http://www.feedburner/ (now owned by Google) for all my RSS feeds, both for the stats and also to add links (“FeedFlare”) to the feeds so that people can post my items into other services.
  • Windows Live Writer – I’ll second the comment made (in Chris’ comments) by Connie Benson that Windows Live Writer truly ROCKS for an offline blog editor (if you are on Windows).  It has *greatly* increased the ease and speed with which I can post blog entries.
  • Screen captures – A recent addition to my tool set has been SnagIt from TechSmith. It lets me (on Windows) very quickly grab a section of the screen and copy it to the clipboard – which I can then paste into Windows Live Writer.  It has again greatly accelerated the speed with which I can make blog entries that include graphics, logos, or other parts of a screen. (Here’s an example.)  There’s also a plugin for Windows Live Writer, although I found that just the copy/paste worked much better/faster for me.  (I’m all about speed for posting, because blogging is something I just fit into random short moments of the day.)

Anyway, those are some of the additions I would make to Chris’ great list.  Hopefully this all will help folks use social media that much more effectively.

Somewhat reluctantly joining Plaxo’s Pulse…. (and some initial thoughts about feeds, grouping contacts and lifestreaming)

image Somewhat reluctantly, I have now joined Plaxo’s “Pulse beta”.  If you are a Pulse user and I know you, please do add me as a connection.  It’s precisely this last sentence that is why I have been reluctant to join Pulse, despite the many raves in the blogosphere of late – I have to rebuild my entire network in yet-another-social-network.

Now, granted, Plaxo makes it easy to find other people through importing various different lists of contacts: GMail, AOL, Yahoo… take your pick.  You can even buy the Premium version (or do the 30-day free trial) and import your LinkedIn contacts.

But I don’t really want to go through the aggravation.  I’ve been a LinkedIn user for now about 5 years and have a nice network there of contacts.  In my daily life these days, it seems that Facebook, Twitter, and my various blogs are the communication tools/sites I use.  Do I really need another one?

Not really… but over time I admit to have become curious enough based on comments from people I know (such as Robert Sanzalone) to break down and open an account.  There’s a couple of reasons.  First, with my interest in identity, I’m admittedly a sucker for a major site that allows OpenID use:

image

but that alone is of course no reason to try out the site.  More, I was intrigued by Plaxo’s “PulseStream”, which seems to be a much more open and useful version of Facebook’s “Newsfeed”.  With just a single glance at a page, I can see the information from the people I find interesting… what their latest blog posts are, what their tweets are if they use Twitter, new contacts they have made.  All aggregated on one page.  Simple and easy. 

I also do like that Plaxo allows a more granular segregation of “friends” than the other sites.  Right now, with Facebook, for example, people are either “friends” with full access to the site or you can make them a “friend” but give them only access to your “limited profile”.  That process though is a bit klunky, in my opinion.  And you have basically one “limited profile” for all your “friends” (if I understand the process clearly).  However, in Plaxo, contacts are divided into three categories: Business, Family and Friends:

image

image Note that you can put a contact into multiple groups, which is nice.  As you work with the site, this segregation has a couple of benefits. On your “Pulse” page, for instance, as shown at right you can choose to only see updates from the appropriate groups (or everyone, or just yourself).  It is also extremely easy to only expose certain information to one of those three categories but not the others. image For instance, in the picture on the left, I am choosing to include my Flickr stream into my “Pulse Stream” and specifying that it is available to the public, but note the various choices that I have.  (I am assuming that if I choose “Nobody” it will only be available to me when I view my Pulse Stream.)

I am sure there will be folks who want more than three groupings.  And there will be undoubtedly some who say “I never use this site with family members, so why can’t I remove that group?”    Allowing grouping like this will surely just invite people to say that they want more groups or want to create their own arbitrary groups.  (Which, to a degree, are we then getting back into groups like Facebook has?)

Regardless, it is nice to be able to group contacts accordingly rather than just labeling them all with the overloaded term “friend”.

Now, it’s intriguing to think that Plaxo’s Pulse might be a tool for “lifestreaming”. It certainly allows the aggregation of feeds (like Tumblr does)… but it’s still a walled garden like Facebook.  In order to see the “Pulse Stream”, one has to login to Plaxo Pulse.  Does this make it any better than Facebook’s NewsFeed?  Not really.  Now I’ve heard rumblings that there may be an RSS feed in the works for your PulseStream, which would then let you pull it outside the Pulse Walls and do something useful with it like put it on your blog or in a widget.  We’ll see.

In the meantime, I’m there on Pulse, at least for some period of time.  If I do know you, please do feel free to add me as a connection.

Congrats to Stuart Henshall and Dina Mehta on their new company, Mosoci…

image Now that Ken Camp has let the cat out of the proverbial bag – and Stuart Henshall is pleased – I’ll join in on wishing Stuart and Dina Mehta all the best in their new venture: Mosoci.  I’ve never had the privilege of meeting Dina (although I’ve certainly known of her as a result of the tsunami and disaster relief efforts and also the Worldchanging site), but I’ve known Stuart now for several years through the VoIP blogging world.  I first learned of him back when he started writing about Skype on his Unbound Spiral blog and then went on to create the Skype Journal.  I’ve subsequently met him face-to-face at a couple of different VoIP-related conferences.   I’ll definitely agree with Ken that Stuart is one of the folks out there who really has a good sense of a larger vision/view of the world.

After my recent post on lifestreams, Stuart dropped me an IM to discuss that post a bit, and along the way mentioned his new venture.  (My immediate comment – if he really wanted to be in the “Web 2.0”, he was already violating the cardinal rule that all Web 2.0 startups must end in an “r” and omit the final vowel (as in Flickr, Tumblr, Tanglr, etc.)!)   As Stuart said in his blog post today, Mosoci is part collaboration, part research:

Mosoci is the platform of our collaboratory around the interests we love, are passionate about and to reinforce the direction and learning we need to go in.

As to exactly what they will be doing, they state this on their “About” page:

Mosoci provides the research, tools and connections that lead to more innovative communities. We help you think upstream, accelerate learning and gain unique insights that create new products, services and markets.

We help companies big and small, global and local hold effective conversations about change. We love consumer products; new media, communications (VoIP, mobile) and technology. We are deeply engaged in Web 2.0 initiatives which are creating revolutionary new best practices for relating to you and me as users, customers and brand communities.

They list a bit more about what they will offer on their Services page.

I wish them all the best – and look forward to whatever will evolve out of their collaboration!

Congrats to Jeremiah Owyang for joining Forrester

image I have never met Jeremiah Owyang, but I’ve been a regular reader of his “Web Strategy” blog for ages. He writes extremely well and many (but not all) of the topics he covers intersect with many of the topics I cover here.   Since reading his blog, I’ve also connected with him via Twitter and Facebook as well, adding yet more dimensions to our connection.  I’ve come to know a bit more about him and appreciate/respect his knowledge and interest.

So I was thrilled to read that he will be joining Forrester Research as an analyst in October.  As he indicates, a lot of the writing and information gathering he’s been doing on his web site are really akin to what goes on within the analyst world… so it’s a natural step for him.  Personally, I think it’s great for Forrester to gain someone with the amount of experience and connections that Jeremiah has.  I would have to think he’ll definitely be an asset to Forrester’s clients.

Congrats, Jeremiah!

Technorati tags: , ,