Category Archives: Social Networking

FaceReviews.com – A sure sign of the success of Facebook Platform when there is a site out to review Facebook apps…

image You have to know that the “Facebook Platform” is being successful when there turns out to be an entire web site dedicated to reviews of Facebook applications!  Yes, indeed, courtesy of the previously mentioned Reuters article, I learned today about FaceReviews.com run by a gent named Rodney Rumford.  (Yes, okay, so I missed it when it appeared on Digg back in mid-June. Hey, I was on vacation!) In looking through the site, I learned of a number of apps I hadn’t yet seen (like this one remarkably from LinkedIn or this one from c|net).  I do like the way he is providing a “rating” of apps – if you are going to do reviews, a rating is a good thing to have in my opinion.

In any event, it’s good to see a site like this and I’ll be adding it to the list of “social media apps” sites I watch.

Reuters reports on Facebook and its growth, app platform (and the fact that its walled garden is a plus)

image Reuters today came out with a lengthy article, “PluggedIn: Facebook lets friends share private view of Web“, that will undoubtedly only continue to fan the flames of Facebook growth.  That growth, in fact, was apparently 1 million new Facebook users in the last week and 5 million in the last 6 weeks.  All in all, not a bad growth curve!  The article starts with the requisite quotes that people need a “Facebook strategy” and other such statements typical of recent Facebook articles.  It also weighs in on the privacy issue:

“Facebook is inherently not open the way the Web is open. Users share all kinds of information on the site they would never share on the Web,” (Facebook CTO Adam) D’Angelo, 22, says. “We get users to divulge more information because we protect users’ privacy.”

Let’s just pause there and take a look at that first sentence again:

Facebook is inherently not open the way the Web is open.

Therein lies my fundamental problem.  Don’t get me wrong: I am a Facebook user.  I am logged into the site pretty much every day.  I’m also a huge privacy advocate who wants control over what information I expose to whom.  So on one level, I do applaud what they are doing.  I’m also a huge fan of open APIs and platforms… so I like what they’ve been doing with their “Platform”.  But I still go back to my feeling that, as I wrote about previously, we’re returning into a world of walled gardens.  To read messages, I have to be logged in to Facebook.  To use the apps, I have to be logged into Facebook.  Facebook has to really be my “portal” to the Internet.  Now, obviously that is good for Facebook… but it worries me to have one site become the lens through which so many people view the Internet.  (Obviously, similar statements though could be said about MySpace or even iGoogle or Yahoo…)

In any event, the Reuters article will no doubt expose even more people to Facebook and generate more interest.  I did enjoy page 3 where they talked about the sudden success application developers have had.  It will indeed be interesting to see where Facebook evolves.

Pownce, Twitter, Jaiku, Facebook… and the perpetual quest for the next bright, shiny thing…

Does this sound familiar?  There is suddenly a site about which absolutely “everyone” you know is suddenly talking.  Suddenly, you have just got to join that site – but of course you must have an invitation and they are hard to get.  You are, though, being asked by all sorts of people you know… who keep telling you how great it is and how this new site will completely revolutionize the Internet and fundamentally alter the way in which we communicate.  Once you give in and join you suddenly find yourself deluged in requests to be added as a “friend” by some people you know and then also by many others you have no clue who they are.  It’s the “new” Internet.  It’s the end of everything old and the start of everything new.  It’s the best invention since sliced bread.  You just gotta see it!

What site am I talking about?

Hmmm… how about Orkut in 2004?

That was certainly the view in those days…. everyone was madly adding Orkut friends, filling out their Orkut profiles… wildly creating “communities” within Orkut and finding new communities to join.  Just like today’s Facebook Groups, you could learn a great amount about someone by the communities they joined.  Private messages were flying back and forth and it was just the place to be, even if many were uncomfortable with the focus of the site on dating.

But then somewhere along the way a good number of folks, myself included, were off to chase the next bright, shiny thing and we stopped checking in to Orkut all that often.  Spam increased within the site, the Brazilians took over … and the rest is history.  There are obviously still a lot of folks using the site, and occasionally I get a message in email that reminds me I need to go visit (usually to remove the “scraps” that spammers leave).

The pattern repeats and repeats and repeats and repeats….

After Orkut, the place to be was LinkedIn… Friendster… Xing… LiveJournal… MySpace… today’s darling seems to be Facebook.

Over the past months “presence services” have seemed to be the rage.  First it was Twitter… then there was a “great migration” over to Jaiku…. then some folks started thinking Facebook status updates were the best… meanwhile all the IM addicts were wondering how these new services were all that different from the IM “advisory” or “mood” messages people had been changing for some time.  (And fundamentally they really aren’t different, except that you can get them via RSS or on a web page and thus have a history.)

image Now, today, some of the Twitter-addicted seem to be convinced that Pownce is the next bright, shiny thing and it will solve all the problems with Twitter and bring us to communication nirvana.  Naturally, being a professional chaser of bright, shiny things, I had to sign up for Pownce.  First impression is that it’s a lot like Twitter with better replies and a way to have both public posts and also ones only visible to your friends.  (Which, of course, I’ve had from a blogging point of view with my LiveJournal account since back in 2004.) Okay, and it has its own desktop software.

Of course, to use it means that I have to rebuild a list of “friends” similar to the lists I already have in all the aforementioned presence, IM and social networking services.  I will, naturally, because there is something in my mental makeup that compels me to try out new services like this.

Meanwhile, of course, someone else is telling me that Hictu.com is really the place to be… if I’ll just go there and sign up, the mist will be lifted from my eyes and everything will be amazingly clear.   Hmmmmm…..

On the need to aggregate status updates, a.k.a. why do I have to update my status and check friends’ status in so many #$@%@# places?

Over the weekend, Ross Mayfield posted “Status Contests and Attention Aggregators” which speaks to an issue I myself faced this morning.  As I have been talking about my impending trip to Stockholm for VON Europe/Podcamp Europe for the past while, I felt an obligation to tell folks that I was not going to be there.  So what did I feel I needed to do:

  • post a note at my blog Disruptive Telephony
  • post a note on my blog Blue Box: The VoIP Security Podcast (assuring people that tonight’s dinner was still on)
  • post a note on my blog Disruptive Conversations
  • post a Twitter update
  • update my Facebook status
  • change my Skype IM mood message (for a little while, anyway)
  • send out email to various folks with whom I had discussed meeting while there

This actually was a good bit of work.  Now, granted, part of it was self-imposed by virtue of my splitting my blogging out from my single blog (curiously, the only one of my major blogs that I did not feel compelled to update).  I also did not update my other IM services because for most of the people with whom I was corresponding, Skype seems to be their IM client these days.  But let’s just collapse this list and also drop out the direct email which is just kind of an obvious item – so here were my updates:

  • blogs
  • Twitter
  • Facebook status
  • IM mood/advisory messages

Still a good number of places to update[1].  And still a pain in the neck that takes a bit of time… perhaps not a lot, but still, a bit of time.  What I really want is a tool that lets me update my status once and then have it automagically posted across all my various “status services” and blogs.  As Ross posts:

Maybe they can work out a way to let you write your status once, publish everywhere, and remove dupes when aggregating.

Or to invert it, I need some way for all of those sites to pull my status from a central location.  Perhaps it’s like the widget displayed on this page that pulls my info from my Facebook status… but, of course, that widget isn’t integrated into my RSS feed for this blog so those who read by RSS will have no view of that widget and my current status in Facebook.

The challenge goes back in part to my previous discussion of the “walled gardens” of social networking.  Part of why I feel compelled to update my status in different places is because there are different “communities of interest” with whom I communicate in those different areas.  There are some who only read one of my blogs.  There are some who only read my Twitter stream.  There are some who live online inside of Facebook… while others really only pay attention to IM.

There are different audiences within different walled gardens.

I am the same way.  There are some people I only follow in Twitter.  Others only in Facebook.  For a good number, I see their Facebook updates, Twitter updates and their blog updates.  But they don’t know that.  If they want to post a message that they want all of their various friends and followers to see, what do they have to do?

Post everywhere, naturally.

Breaching those walls – or at least running communication conduits through the walls – will become increasingly important as people continue to understand the utility of these various different “status services”.  I agree with Ross Mayfield that new forms of status aggregators will need to evolved.  The walls must be torn down – or at least eased a bit – because the current situation can’t really last long, especially if these services are to move up the curve into mass adoption.  (Either that, or one or two of the biggest sites will win out as the place that people use for status updates.)

[1] And yes, I could throw my MySpace page in there, too, but I don’t really use it all that much and so have not attracted people who follow my updates there.

a.placebetween.us – what an incredibly cool way to find a place to meet! (and a great mashup example)

image Have you ever wanted to meet someone for coffee/food/whatever but found yourself at a loss for a place to meet that was somewhere between the two of you?   It might be that you want to meet someone in your same town/city… or the person might be many miles away.

Well, by way of a Twitter message from Donna Papacosta, I learned today of site called a.placebetween.us, that does exactly that.  I have to say this is one of the coolest Google Maps-mashups I’ve seen to date.  (Well, okay, Twittervision is definitely cool, too.)  In the field in the upper right, you enter first one address , press Add, and then the second and press Add.  Then you say the type of meeting you want (“coffee”, “food”, etc.) and then you click “What’s Between”… ta da! 

Very fun – and useful – mashup!

How to be more productive with Facebook? Try the Facebook toolbar for Firefox!

image As part of my continued experimentation with Facebook, I recently installed the Facebook Toolbar for Firefox and have to say that I’m quite impressed.  Now, this toolbar isn’t new… it was released back in November 2006, but I just hadn’t tried it out yet.

image As shown in the image to the right (from Facebook’s web site), the toolbar offers a good number of features.  I haven’t really used the “search Facebook” feature, but I definitely do like the notifications that appear telling you how many messages or friend requests you have.  With a single click, you can jump directly to that part of your inbox.  Even more useful to me is the “house” icon that takes you directly to your Facebook home page.  Great way to jump there when you want to.  The “Quick Links” feature similarly gets you to other parts of Facebook.

I also like the “Share” button that lets you easily post a link with commentary to your internal Notes page inside of Facebook.  In a way, it’s similar to the del.icio.us add-on to Firefox that I use… a pop-up appears, you enter the commentary and press the submit button.  Of course, this toolbar only posts inside the walled garden of Facebook… but it is a nice quick way to get info posted there.

imagePerhaps one of the greatest things I like about the toolbar is the fact that after you install it you get pop-up “toast” notifications when friends update their status message, send you messages, add Notes, etc.  So now I get toast pop-ups for Facebook along with those pop-ups for various IM notifications.  I have to say it’s rather nice… but then again, I don’t have a zillion “friends” in Facebook so that I’m always seeing status updates.  If I did, this could be a bit annoying.  For now, though, while I continue my experimentation, I do find it quite useful.

All in all, the Facebook Toolbar has already made my personal use of Facebook more productive.  If you are looking for a way to enhance your use of Facebook, do check it out.

Facebook… as an "application platform"? (and a collection of links on the topic)

For those of us using (or experimenting with) Facebook, the information shown in the image to the right (click for a larger image[1]) is become rather routine.  Yes, indeed:

Facebook users are going crazy adding “applications” to their profiles!

Applications?  Huh?  In Facebook? It’s “just a social networking site”, right?  So what’s with the apps?

Well, it’s pretty clear that Facebook has much grander aspirations (see all the links below). Although it was only mentioned briefly in a post to the Facebook blog last Friday, the “Facebook Platform” is now out with full documentation of the APIs and a range of applications already out there (you can also take the “Platform tour“).  While people have been building apps for Facebook for quite some time, the big launch was last Friday and this weekend. (This CNN/Fortune story, “Facebook’s plan to hook up the world” is probably a good place to start.)

Primarily, the applications seem to allow you to either:

  1. add content to your “Profile” page inside of Facebook (as I have done with “Elsewhere on the Internet“, an app that lets you easily add external links to your profile); or
  2. interact with some external service (as I have done with the Twitter app, which essentially embeds your Twitter home page inside of Facebook and also puts your latest entry on your Facebook profile)

This alone makes it quite interesting as a way to integrate and distribute applications, but the more intriguing aspect of the “Platform” is that applications have access to the “News Feed” that appears on your own Facebook home page and appears in a similar fashion to your Facebook “friends”.  There’s two elements here of interest:

  1. Viral distribution – As I note in the image above, whenever a friend installs a new application, you learn about it from your News Feed and can easily click the link to see what the app is.  I’ve done this myself already numerous times, and I’ve also noticed friends installing an app that I installed in the day or so after I’ve done so (perhaps because they saw the fact that I installed it in their News Feed).  This provides a fantastic “word-of-mouth” type of distribution of apps and introduces you to apps you might not have heard of. [2]
  2. Direct access to the News Feed – Whenever someone posts from the Twitter app inside of Facebook, I see it in my News Feed.  Thus, the News Feed becomes the merger of all the other Facebook items plus the items from the Facebook application.  Now, there are some limits as to the number of times an app can access your feed (so that you don’t get flooded), but it’s definitely an interesting development.

I think that I will no doubt be writing a great amount more about this Facebook Platform over the coming while.  I still have a great concern about the “walled garden” aspect of Facebook and I agree with Jeff Jarvis about the need for the platform to ideally be far more open.  But this is certainly an interesting step in the evolution of the site – and it will be quite fascinating to see what emerges.

While I will write more, in the meantime, let me point to some of the articles in the great mass of coverage (or even more here) that I found more interesting (Note, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced all this at Facebook’s “F8” conference last week and some coverage is calling the Facebook platform “F8”):

[1] And yes, that grey line is me using the “spraypaint” in Windows Pain to obscure an entry that is not relevant!

[2] For instance, I just learned from my News Feed that one of my friends in the hockey-mad world of Ottawa, Canada, just added the “Go Sens Go!” application – although to understand what that is, you would need to understand that here at the end of May when the rest of North America is enjoying the warmth of Spring and Summer, those folks up in Ottawa are still obsessing about a bunch of men sliding around on ice!

Melcrum’s Communicators’ Network makes its debut – another social network for communications professionals

Today I was invited by someone I know, Judy Gombita, to join Melcrum’s new “Communicators’ Network“.  Needing a brief mental break from something rather intense that I was working on, I decided to check it out, especially after having heard Neville Hobson talk about this upcoming site on mutiple FIR episodes.  I will candidly admit to a bit of “new social networking site fatigue” these days and for that reason had not yet even joined the MyRagan social networking site established by Ragan Communications and the topic of much recent discussion within the PR section of the blogosphere.  It’s not that I don’t think sites like these aren’t good ideas… despite my writing about “Walled Gardens” of social networking, I do see value in separate sites for different communities.  It’s just that with Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter as well as my own blogs and all my various IM clients, I am personally already pretty darn networked (and yes, I have a MySpace page, too, but I don’t use it really) and I’m not really looking for more ways to connect to people. 

In any event, I needed a brief break so I decided to try it out.  The site was originally announced back in early May, and had some further details announced later as it entered beta testing, but appears to only be really available today for others to try it out. 

The initial account creation process was very straightforward and had an easy “wizard” kind of feel to it.  The end result was a “profile page” (note the customized URL – and also note that I haven’t filled out all the fields so some are blank) that, well, looked a lot like the profile pages on most of the other social networking sites.  In looking around, the site looks like it could potentially be quite useful for communicators… if it builds the requisite mass of people involved.

Overall, definitely an interesting site to explore further.

Now, I do realize that the site was only made publicly available today, and that there will be the inevitable startup issues. I do appreciate the work involved with launching a site like this, and really only had a few nits to pick:

1. Difficult to find your contacts – if you click on the image above-right, you’ll get a larger version of the image that shows the top menu bar.  What you don’t see anywhere is “Contacts” and I spent a few minutes trying to figure out how I got to my list of contacts until I eventually figured out that I had to go to “My Home” and see the contacts there. If you look at any of the other social networking sites, though, you’ll see that typically there is a “My Contacts” (LinkedIn), “Address Book”(Xing) or “Friends”(Facebook) link in the top nav bar that gets you quickly to your list of contacts.  Now, maybe I missed this, but I couldn’t find it on the site.

2. No way to personalize contact request messages – Once I figured out where my Contacts were, I naturally wanted to add someone like, oh, Neville.  So I went to his page, clicked “Add as Contact” and then was asked to confirm that I did want to add him.  I did so and then received the message that “Your contact is pending”.  Outside of the grammatical issue that I would think this should be “Your contact request is pending”, the larger issue to me is that there is no way to personalize that contact request.  Now obviously I know Neville from FIR, but there may be other people to whom I want to sent a request to add them as a contact who don’t know me.  I would like to explain to them why I would like to add them as a friend.  Most all the other major social networking sites and IM services let you add this kind of personalized messages.

3. Only one IM listing allowed – Speaking of IM services, in your profile you are only allowed to show one IM service (or at least, I couldn’t see how to show more than one).  That’s great but (with the walled gardens of IM) most of us are on several services and so it does little good to show only one if the person looking primarily uses another.

4. The “My Blogs” area only shows blog entries written there – Let’s face it, anyone who has seen the nav bar on the top of any of my blogs knows this… I don’t need anywhere else to blog! I think it’s excellent that Melcrum provides a platform for blogging because I know there are a great number of communicators out there who haven’t yet started blogging and this may give them an easy and painless way to do so.  I am definitely not one of those folks, though.  For me, I just want to import the feed from my appropriate blog into the site and have it show up there for people who find me through that site.  I can import a feed from an external blog, but it only so far shows up on my “blog” page internally – at least that I could see.

Now, obviously, this all may change as the Melcrum folks work on the site and improve it as it moves out of beta usage into a wider public usage.  In my initial inquiries to date, they were very responsive to points I raised.

I ran out of time to really explore further (my break was just that… a brief break) but I’ll keep checking it out to see how it evolves.  I think the real question for both this site and the MyRagan site is whether or not they can really provide enough value to communicators for them to spend some of their precious time inside of those sites. 

Time will tell, and it’s all an interesting experiment in social networking… what works best?  building smaller sections within larger communities/sites (like Facebook, LinkedIn)?  or building separate focused communities/sites?   My fatigued self who is already in too many sites thinks it may be the former, but I’m certainly open to the possibility that it may be the latter.  Anyway, kudos to the Melcrum team for bringing out what looks to be a strong contender.

Of cowboy boots, Twitter, Facebook and the changing ways we communicate (a.k.a. how social networking sites helped me buy some new boots…)

As readers of my Twitter feed know, today I had a problem.  I had just crossed through Canadian Customs and was now inside Canada when I noticed that my Blackberry battery was almost dead.  Having told my wife that I would call as I usually did when I got to Ottawa, I figured I would give her a call now while I still had battery power.  I did, but our conversation took an immediate turn:

“Did you get my message?”
“No, what message?”
“I called your cell phone and left you a voicemail message. You left your boots and jacket here!”

Uh-oh.   Though I had been in Verizon coverage area while driving through rural upstate New York, I never received either her call nor her voicemail message.  (Ironically, I did not actually receive the voicemail notification until I reached Ottawa!) 

Now people who know me know that for “dress shoes” I pretty much always wear western/cowboy boots.  With suits.  With slacks.  With khakis. Whatever.  I have for now well over 10 years.  I don’t recall why I started, except that perhaps it was because we lived by a really great boot store in Hooksett, NH.  Over the years it just became part of my dress code…. and to a degree I guess you would say part of my “personal brand”.  After meeting someone again they would say “Oh, yeah, you’re the guy with the boots!”  or “Oh, yeah, you’re the guy with the beard and the boots!”  Hear that enough and you realize that it’s something memorable/remarkable that sticks in people’s minds….  here is this guy from New Hampshire or later Ottawa wearing cowboy boots.  It seemed to make an impression (good or bad might be open to discussion 🙂 and in a sales-oriented world where relationships – and being remembered – matter, it just became part and parcel of my dress code.

So here I was already in Canada with no boots and wearing some black slip-on L.L. Bean mocassin-type shoes… not exactly what I want to wear while doing presentations tomorrow.   Had I called before crossing the border, I could have gone back into the Akwesesne reservation where there’s a store that I seem to recall selling boots.  But the thought of going back over the bridge, through US Customs, to the store, then back across the bridge and through Canadian Customs again just didn’t seem appealing, so I figured I’d just find a place in Ottawa.

But where to buy boots in Ottawa?  I had never had to buy any in Ottawa and couldn’t think right then of anyone to call who might know about boots (I did much later).  I realized that if I waited to get to Mitel’s office in the westernmost “Kanata” section of Ottawa to ask around, I would have had to go all the way through the city first and then probably backtrack.

So I posted a message to Twitter asking if anyone had a moment and could search on “cowboy boots, ottawa, ontario” and email me some names and numbers of stores. (Now, I could have asked people to send me a “direct” message via Twitter, but I wasn’t sure I had configured Twitter to send direct messages via SMS, so I fell back to the lowest common denominator of email.)  When I checked about 15 minutes later, there were no messages and so I used the mobile interface to Facebook to change my status message there to say I was urgently looking for a store in Ottawa that sold cowboy boots.

Another 20 minutes (at another rest area) I had an email message from Sebastian Kiel in Germany who told me it wasn’t all that easy but here were some links.  I took a look and, though I couldn’t remotely think of “The Bay” selling western boots, I figured “Hey, this is Canada after all!” and gave a call.  The guy in the shoe department  there was very helpful and while they did not carry boots, he told me that I could get them at Apple Saddlery (Duh… a *tack* shop!) off of Innes Road and gave me some directions.

At this point I was nearing Ottawa and got off on Innes Road.  I realized I was unclear on which direction I needed to go, so I pulled into a parking lot and figured I’d use Google Maps to find the exact location.  However, Alec Saunders had already sent me a Facebook reply also telling me about Apple Saddlery and giving me the exact address.  I looked up to my left, saw a street number, looked to my right… and saw the store down across the street!  At this point, Michael Bellina in New Jersey and Greg Demetrick back in Burlington, VT, had both also emailed me responses, followed a few minutes later by Brad Grier out in Alberta, Canada.  (And at which point I also updated Twitter and Facebook to say “thank you” and that I was all set.)  Interestingly, there was very little overlap between the sets of stores sent my way… it turns out that “cowboy boots” was not a useful search term and so people tried something else.  (“western boots”, or, in retrospect, “riding boots” might have worked much better).

In the end, I wound up with a great pair of boots (pictured above (click for a larger picture), by Boulet, and amazingly manufactured in Canada versus China, where most shoes seem to be made these days).  I tend to prefer a entirely black boot so that when your suit pant legs rise up slightly when walking or sitting the design doesn’t jump out at people, but the all-black boots they had in my size didn’t quite fit, so I wound up with this nice pair.

But think for a bit how all that communication occurred.  I didn’t call anyone (initially).  I didn’t email anyone.  I didn’t even IM anyone.  Instead I posted to two “social networking” sites and people who could see my status updates contacted me.  Now I’ve met both Alec and (my physical neighbor) Greg.  I know Sebastian through FIR and podcasting. Michael I’ve just started to know through CAPOW.  Brad I have never met.  But they all responded to the call for help and took a moment to do reply back to me (and do searches).  MANY thanks to them all!

The communication did NOT occur through “traditional” methods… instead it occurred within walled gardens, but yet with email assisting (in getting info to me and letting me know of the Facebook posting).  It involved a global “community” of people who were staying up on what each other were doing….  and it had a successful conclusion.

Fascinating.  (says a very grateful boot-wearing man)

P.S. How was I doing all this if my Blackberry was dead?  Well, I was charging the Blackberry by connecting it via a USB cable to my laptop, which I then left running.

Update on LinkedIn and email address requirement – you *can* return to requiring people now your address

Just discovered a bit more info about the change I wrote about last week at LinkedIn where e-mail addresses are no longer required for invitations.  In receiving yet another contact request today in email, I noticed this at the bottom of the message:

Following the link brought me to this page (click for larger image):

which shows the change.  The default is now “Notify me of all invitations” where as the previous behavior is better described by the second option “Only notify me of invitations from people who know my email address or appear in my ‘Other Contacts’ list“.    It would appear to me that LinkedIn has rolled out this change and in doing so changed everyone’s default to receive all invitations.  Which, realistically, is what I would expect them to do, given that they want to enable people to make more connections.  Loosen it up for everyone… and then let those of us who care go back in and restrict the setting.

Needless to say, I’ve changed my setting so that people need to know my address (which, gee, is not very hard to find (see the sidebar)).  As I just wrote in reply to Jeff Pulver’s “The ‘Obligations’ of Social Networking“, I only accept LinkedIn connection requests from people I know (and I figure that if they really want to connect, they either already know or can find my email address).

Technorati tags: , ,